North American Wildlife and Habitat
  • Home
  • THE BOOK
  • 2018 Daylight Activity Index
  • Outdoor Writer & Photo Journalist
    • CWD - Missouri
    • CWD Meeting 2025
    • CWD Meeting 2018
    • Missouri Wild Turkey >
      • THE RISE AND FALL OF THE MISSOURI WILD TURKEY
      • 2021 Missouri Spring Turkey Season Worse in 24 Years
      • Missouri Wild Turkey Regulation Changes Needed
      • Missouri Wild Turkey Numbers
      • Missouri Wild Turkey Conservation
      • Missouri Wild Turkey Research
      • MDC Mythbusters Missouri Turkey Population
      • MDC Commission Meeting Wild Turkey
      • Missouri Quail and Wild Turkey
      • Missouri Wild Turkey Handout
      • 2022 Missouri Wild Turkey Season
      • Missouri Wild Turkey Habitat Initiative
      • Missouri Wild Turkey Habitat Initiative Only
      • Wild Turkey Hens Killed in Missouri
      • Wild Turkey Questions for MDC
      • 2022 Missouri Wild Turkey Poult Production
      • 1st Annual National Wild Turkey Symposium
      • 2nd Annual National Wild Turkey Symposium
      • 3rd Annual National Wild Turkey Symposium
      • 4th Annual National Wild Turkey Symposium
      • 6th Annual National Wild Turkey Symposium
      • 7th Annual National Wild Turkey Symposium
      • 8th Annual National Wild Turkey Symposium
      • 9th Annual National Wild Turkey Symposium
      • 2023 Missouri Spring Turkey Season
      • Missouri Wild Turkey History
      • Missouri Bobwhite Quail History
      • Missouri Rough Grouse History
      • Missouri Pheasant History
    • Missouri Black Bear >
      • Missouri Black Bear Population
      • Missouri Black Bear Baiting
      • Missouri Bears Only
      • Black Bear Hunting Series >
        • Black Bear Biology and Behavior
        • Black Bear Hunting Methods
        • Black Bear Scouting
        • Black Bear Scouting Continued
        • Black Bear Field Judging Bears
        • Black Bear Hunting Season
        • Black Bear on the Ground
        • Black Bear is out of the woods
      • Missouri Black Bear Season 2021
    • Missouri Wild Hog Crisis >
      • HISTORY OF MISSOURI FERAL 2022 HOGS
      • Missouri Wild Hog Records
      • Bollinger Wild Hog
      • Wayne County Hogs
      • Madison Hogs
      • Perry Hogs
      • Reynolds Hog
      • Iron Hogs
      • Stoddard Hogs
      • Newton Hogs
      • Phelps Hogs
      • St. Francois Hogs
      • Shannon Hogs
      • Carter Hogs
      • Ripley Hogs
      • Oregon Hogs
      • Texas Hogs
      • Butler Hogs
      • Pulaski Hogs
      • Crawford Hogs
      • Dent Hogs
      • Laclede Hogs
      • Barry Hogs
      • Stone Hogs
      • Taney Hogs
      • McDonald Hogs
      • Cape Girardeau Hogs
      • Johnson Hog
      • Washington Hog
      • Dade Hog
      • Wright Hog
    • Missouri Elk
    • Horntagger's Radio Show
    • Horntagger's Radio Show Phil
    • Horntagger Outdoor Columns
    • Horntagger Outdoor Travel >
      • Aruba
      • Wyoming
      • Charleston South Carolina
      • Horntagger's Key's Florida 2015
      • Horntagger Outdoor Travel Missouri
      • Horntagger Outdoor Travel Illinois
      • Horntagger Outdoor Travel Massachusetts
      • Horntagger Outdoor Travel Arizona
      • Horntagger Outdoor Travel Alabama
  • Business Imagery Consultant
    • 1860 Trapper Pack Project
  • Outdoor Shows and Events
    • NATIONAL TRAPPERS ASSOCIATION CONVENTION
    • Eastern Ozark Rendezvous 2018
    • NWTFSHOW2018
    • NWTFSHOW2017
    • #DeerCon17
    • QDMA 2016 Convention
    • NWTF2016
    • Predator Management Program
    • 2012 Outdoor Shows and Events
  • Outdoor Product Development
  • Wildlife and Habitat Improvement
    • QDMA Deer Steward 1 Branson Missouri
    • QDMA Deer Steward 2 LaGrange KY
    • QDMA Deer Steward III - Bogart GA
    • Wildlife Management Plan
  • Hunter Selfie
  • Small Landowner
  • Missouri Predator Management on Private Lands

RACCOON HISTORY - UNITED STATES

Picture

PRE - ​COLONIZATION ERA OF THE RACCOON

In North America, Native Americans regularly hunted raccoons as food and for their fur, which they used to make clothing. Fur from various mammals, including raccoons, was used by certain indigenous people to create hats. The size of the pelt and the thickness of the fur made raccoon pelts an attractive choice for hat-making. The raccoon’s tail, often left attached to a pelt, became a prominent component of these caps. In addition to being part of one’s normal hunting attire and a means to stay warm in the winter, possession of a “coonskin cap” sometimes conveyed special status within a tribe.

Native Americans used more traditional trapping methods, such as basic snares, pit traps, and deadfalls. In the early 16th century, European settlers brought metal trapping devices with them and established the North American fur trade with Europe. The fur trade was the main source of commerce for settlers and funded the extended period of colonization.
​

​COLONIZATION ERA OF THE RACCOON

Around 1550, the "Beaver Era" started and would last for about 300 years. The beaver population at the time was prosperous and widespread throughout almost all of New York State. Pelts were treasured for their warmth, texture, and durability, so many were traded, sold, or used in clothing production. Other furbearers were trapped during "The Beaver Era," including the bobcat, badger, muskrat, RACCOON, river otter and coyote.

Early colonial settlers used raccoons as a source of fur and meat during the 1600s, a practice that continued through the 1800s. Raccoon fat was used as a lubricant, leather softener, and replacement for beef lard. Although raccoon pelts were not as prized as those from beaver, they still became objects for trade and bartering in poorer rural areas. As was true for Native Americans, settlers also made coonskin caps, which became an iconic image of frontiersmen like Davy Crockett and Daniel Boone.
 
Early settlers also brought the European tradition of hound hunting to the New World in the 1600s, where hunting success was enhanced by relying on the dogs’ keen senses of sight and smell. Since raccoons first appeared in written records in 1612.



FRENCH FUR TRADE OF THE RACCOON

The 1600’s - France’s claim to Canada and neighboring areas dates back to 1535 when Jacques Cartier discovered the St. Lawrence River and sailed to the site of what is now Montreal. In 1608 Samuel de Champlain arrived as governor, and settlement began.

Many of those first immigrants found the fur trade an easier and more profitable existence than the drudgery of farming. To control the trade, a string of outposts was established, some where missionaries had already settled. Years before Detroit was founded, several of these forts, or trading posts, were flourishing in Michigan: Sault Ste. Marie (1668), Fort de Baude at St. Ignace (1686), Fort St. Joseph – where Port Huron is now (1686), one in St. Joseph (1679), and one in Niles (1691).


Before long, Cadillac reported that 2000 Indians had set up their living quarters in the area, and others were coming in to trade their furs. The pelts that were shipped from Fort Pontchartrain of Detroit included bear, elk, dear, marten, RACCOON, mink, lynx, muskrat, opossum, wolf, fox and, of course, beaver. Within a rather short time, Detroit was established as the center of the Great Lakes fur trade.

ENGLISH FUR TRADE OF RACCOON

​The 1700’s - For the next forty years the prices for goods in Detroit were quoted in terms of beavers or bucks a buck was a buckskin, the hide of one large, prime, male deer.

The British decreed that one beaver pelt was worth one good buckskin or one small buckskin and one doeskin.

One small beaver was worth one marten or two RACCOONS, while one large beaver might be worth as much as six RACCOONS
​
The Commandant at Detroit in 1772 described the traders as “a sad set, for they would cut each others’ throats for a raccoon skin”
​

HUDSON BAY COMPANY FUR TRADE OF THE RACCOON

Hudson Bay Company from the 1800s and early 1900s, hunters and trappers in the U.S. sold an average of about 3,500 raccoon pelts to the Hudson Bay Company annually.

​By the mid-1940s, annual national pelt sales to the Hudson Bay Company had increased to 1 million, but ultimately rose to nearly 2 million by the early 1960s.
 
​

UNITED STATES FUR TRADE OF THE RACCOON
​

  • The Raccoon U.S. harvest averaged about 360,000 per year in the 1930s, increased to about 900,000 per year in the 1940s, and increased further to 1.3 million pelts per year in the 1960s (40 times greater than the Canadian harvest).


    In the 1970s the U.S. harvest more than doubled to 3.1 million pelts, and thus far in the 1980s the harvest has averaged about 4.2 million pelts per year (26 times greater than the Canadian harvest).


    The Raccoon populations, although they had declined to low levels by the 1930s, then experienced a continent-wide population explosion from 1943 to the late 1940s. Since that time, high population levels have been maintained to such an extent that the raccoon range has expanded to include areas where they were rare or absent during the 1930s.


    Hence the large harvest of raccoons during the 20th century is mainly a reflection of the increase in the sizes of raccoon populations.


    Additionally, in the 1920s, 1930s, and 1940s, raccoon coats were extremely popular in the United States, especially among college students, and this popularity has continued to the present partly as a result of the moderate price of raccoon coats.


    The total North American yearly average harvest of more than 4.4 million pelts in the 1980s makes the raccoon harvest the most valuable of all North American furbearers. The value of the North American harvest of raccoons was estimated to be about $94 million (CDN) in 1982–83, about 3.3 times greater than the value of the second most valuable species, the muskrat ($28 million CDN).

    Feb 2023 - International source - The harvest of raccoon for United States fur value is the lowest it has ever been, less than 100,000 and could be far less.

    The Trapper
    December 2023
    Latest Fur Market Insights
    Raccoons remain at dismal prices until Russia comes back to table. Until war is over it won't happen.
    I cannot see raccoon prices going upward for the NEXT THREE YEARS!​


Picture

Do you know YOUR states predator prey history?

Picture

​What is your state high mark to today raccoon numbers?
               
STATE of the STATE Raccoon Harvest -

Iowa - 300,000 in 2011 to 34,000 in 2021.

Illinois – 141,000 in 1979 to 134,000 in 1987 to 35,000 in 1991.

Arkansas – 78,000 in 1996 to 21,000 in 2013 to 1,600 in 2021.

Missouri – 300,000 in 1977 to 200,000 in 1998 to 150,000 in 2012 to 21,000 in 2021 Raccoon Pelts sold.

Virginia, raccoon harvest reached a maximum (118,950 pelts) during the 1980-81 season. The highest average pelt price ($22.32) was reached several years earlier during the 1979-80 season (adjusted for inflation, this average was $87.57).


Missouri - PREDATOR HISTORY

1940 – 1941 – 834,935 pelts harvested (most pelts sold) (over 70% were opossum and skunk pelts) most pelts sold

1945 – 1946 – Missouri Fur Dealer Permit 1,192

Raccoons – A Natural History - Zeveloff, p. 98 - Biologist Allen Twichell and Herbert Dill reported the highest raccoon density known to occur: During the winter of 1948, 100 were removed from den trees on 41 ha (102 acres) tract of Swan Lake National Wildlife Refuge, a waterfowl reserve on a Missouri Marsh, yielding an astounding density of about 1 raccoon per acre or nearly 250 km2.

Missouri Raccoon population indicated that it could replace itself in 7.4 years.

 
1979 – 1980 – 634,338 (2nd highest pelts sold - when average raccoon pelt values were estimated at $27.50.

1997 – 1998 – Over 200,000 Raccoons were trapped.

1980 – 1981 – 13,248 trapping permits sold in the state of Missouri
 
2009, MDC estimated the statewide raccoon population at 1.4 million with annual trapping of 100,000 to 200,000.

In 2010, MDC estimated the statewide raccoon population at 1 to 2 million with annual trapping of annual trapping of 100,000 to 200,000.
 
2017 – 2018 – Just Over 26,000 Raccoons were trapped.
2017 – 2018 – Only 7,189 trapping permits sold in the state of Missouri.

2018 - 2019 – 6,956 trapping permits sold in the state of Missouri
2018 - 2019 – Raccoon totaled 22,562 trapped
2018-19 season resulted in the lowest raccoon harvest since 1942 and the longest duration of decline in harvest numbers over the last 25 years with seven consecutive years of decline.
2018- 2019 – Opossum harvest totaled 593 lowest opossum harvests on record.
2018- 2019 – Skunk also resulted in the lowest Skunk harvest since 2000-01 only 156.
2018 – 2019 - Coyote population appears to be on a slight increase since the 1970s.
2018 -2019 - Bobcat season was down 28.40% from 2017-18 The decline in harvest and in the number of bobcat pelts purchased by fur dealers also is likely attributed to a poor global fur market.
2019 - 41 Fur Buyer Permits
2019 - 2020 - Trapping numbers and prices this year still falling.

2020-21 - Raccoon harvest in totaled 21,589 and included individuals harvested by both trapping and hunting methods. The 2020-21 season resulted in the second lowest raccoon harvest since 1942.

Why does this matter? Because we are current in un-natural high predator population!
 
NEST PREDATOR CAPTURE
 
2021 - Raccoon Count, Site 1 - 1.57 per acre, Site 2 - 2.02 per acre, Site 3 - 3.34 per acre
2021 - Opossum Count, Site 1 - .65 per acre, Site 2 - 1.11 per acre, Site 3 - .93 per acre
 
2022 - Raccoon Count, Site 1 - .50 per acre, Site 2 - .09 per acre, Site 3 - .40 per acre, Site 4 - .07 per acre
2022 - Opossum Count, Site 1 - .18 per acre, Site 2 - .27 per acre, Site 3 - .25 per acre, Site 4 - .03 per acre
 
Skunks, Foxes, Coyote, Bobcats exist but no count is shown.
 
Armadillo’s, Bears, and Wild Hogs do not exist in this research area in Missouri

Picture
Picture

VIRGINIA OPOSSUM HISTORY

Picture

​Making a difference one at a time. As of today, 3 males and 1 female add to the total of 164 off 80 acres over the seasons.


Prior to the 20th century the average annual harvest of opossums by American companies increased from slightly more than 34,000 pelts in the 1850s to more than 546,000 in the 1890s.

In the 20th century the opossum usually has been harvested in greater numbers than most other furbearer species. For example, in the 1970s and 1980s, only raccoons, muskrats, and nutrias were harvested in greater numbers than opossums.
 
An average annual harvest of nearly 1.4 million pelts was taken in the 1930s and an average of 1.6 million was taken in the 1940s. The harvest dropped to slightly more than 340,000 in the 1950s and 180,000 in the 1960s, then increased greatly to more than 940,000 by the 1980s.
 
Although the harvest of opossums is large, it is probably largely incidental to the capture of other furbearers. Hence the large increase in the harvest of opossums since the 1960s may reflect increases in population sizes of opossums.
 
Prior to European settlement the northern limits of the Virginia opossum were Kentucky, Indiana, and Ohio, but during the last century the range of the opossum has expanded northward and westward. The distribution of the opossum on the western coast of North America resulted from planned introductions and escapes from captivity in the late 1800s and early 1900s.


The opossum held the foremost position in the fur trade among marsupials because quantities obtainable were large and the pelts could be dyed to simulate the appearance of higher price pelts.
 
You think you know Opossum is just another EGG EATER with a population 2 or 3 times more than Raccoons giving birth to around 18 to 20 but only 13 can nurse, the rest just fall off and die.
 
Because of one of the highest furbearer populations in America - Wild Turkey hens are very susceptible to nest abandonment when flushed from the nest by a predator. My understanding that intentional flushes of known nests show that upwards to 50% of all hens abandon their nests after only one contact. Hens that don't abandon after the first event almost never, as high as 85%, suffer more than (2) flushes from the nest.
 
They disperse more ticks across your property in a day than they eat in a lifetime.
​
Opossums are scent hunters, that’s why they find and eat on dead animals and love wet spring, nothing like the smell of a wet hen.
 
The earliest research (1851) was by John James Audubon2, which described the stomach contents of an opossum that he had shot and gutted in the woods. Subsequent research was more comprehensive, especially a paper by Bill Hamilton3 that described the diet items of 186 opossums in the same manner we were doing: recording the amount of each type of insect, flower and vertebrate species found. In total, the literature presented the results of diet analysis of over 1,280 opossums from across their range in the United States. Not a single paper reported ticks being found in the stomachs, or in any other section of the gastrointestinal tract, of Virginia opossums.
 
The latest research (2022) New Study Says Possums Don’t Like Eating Ticks: According to Dr. Bret Collier, associate professor of wildlife ecology at Louisiana State University’s School of Renewable Natural Resources, “No, not at all, period. Ticks are not, in any manner, selected for by Virginia opossums.” He cites a 2021 peer-reviewed paper called “Are Virginia opossums really ecological traps for ticks? Ground truthing laboratory operations,” by Dr. Cecilia Hennessy and Kaitlyn Hild of Eureka College’s Division of Science and Mathematics.


Although the number of opossums harvested typically has been higher than most other furbearers for most of the 20th century, the average pelt price for the opossum in both 1982–83 and 1983–84 exceeded only that of red squirrels and weasels. In the 1940s, European markets usually dyed the pelts to simulate skunk pelts and then used them as they used skunk pelts. Harding (1915) also noted this practice and concluded that the price of opossum pelts fluctuated and was largely governed by skunk prices. This may partially explain why the harvest of opossums was at its lowest levels during the 1950s and 1960s, when skunk harvests were also low.


Missouri – “Opossums and Skunks” 500,000 in 1940


Per Missouri Department of Conservation Fur Bearer Report


2023 – 2024 - Missouri Furbearer Report Pelts Sold Opossum – 884
2022 – 2023 - Missouri Furbearer Report Pelts Sold Opossum – 689
2020 – 2021 - Missouri Furbearer Report Pelts Sold Opossum - 942
2018 – 2019 - Missouri Furbearer Report Pelts Sold Opossum - 782
2017 – 2018 - Missouri Furbearer Report Pelts Sold Opossum – 593 – Lowest on Record
2016 – 2017 - Missouri Furbearer Report Pelts Sold Opossum - 1,176
2015 – 2016 - Missouri Furbearer Report Pelts Sold Opossum - 2,455
2014 – 2015 - Missouri Furbearer Report Pelts Sold Opossum - 4,874
2013 – 2014 - Missouri Furbearer Report Pelts Sold Opossum - 11,529
2012 – 2013 - Missouri Furbearer Report Pelts Sold Opossum - 7,773
2011 – 2012 - Missouri Furbearer Report Pelts Sold Opossum - 12,185
2010 – 2011 - Missouri Furbearer Report Pelts Sold Opossum - 9,295
2009 – 2010 - Missouri Furbearer Report Pelts Sold Opossum - 4,491
2008 – 2009 - Missouri Furbearer Report Pelts Sold Opossum - 9,600
2007 – 2008 - Missouri Furbearer Report Pelts Sold Opossum - 11,135



SKUNKS HISTORY

Picture

​The average annual harvest of skunks in North America prior to the 20th century increased from nearly 50,000 pelts in the 1850s to more than 500,000 in the 1880s. Harvest by the Hudson’s Bay Company during this period accounted for 13% of the total harvest at most.

Harvest by the American companies increased from more than 43,000 pelts per year in the 1850s to more than 500,000 per year in the 1880s.
In the 20th century the average annual harvest of skunks was intermediate in number of pelts harvested when compared with other species, being lower than the harvest of such species as the beaver, red squirrel, mink, opossum, red fox, raccoon, nutria, and muskrat.
 
Because both striped skunks and spotted skunks have increased their geographic ranges in North America with the spread of settlement this relatively low harvest probably reflects a reduced market and lower prices for skunk pelts. In 1982–83 and 1983–84, only the red squirrel and weasels had average pelt prices that were lower than those of the skunks.
 
The total North American average annual harvest of all skunk pelts was only about 113,000 in the 1920s (but note the lack of U.S. data). It then increased dramatically to more than 1.2 million in the 1930s and 1940s, before decreasing just as dramatically to about 140,000 in the 1950s and about 38,000 in the 1960s.
 
Although skunk populations are susceptible to outbreaks of leptospirosis, tularemia, and distemper, and skunks are vectors for rabies, the distribution of striped skunks and spotted skunks was likely increasing during the 1950s and 1960s.

Hence the reduced harvests in the 1950s and 1960s were the result of reduced market demand. In part this was due to garment labeling laws introduced in the late 1930s which prohibited the use of names that obscured the true identity of the fur used in the garments. For example, skunk coats were often marketed as “American Sable” by the garment industry. After labeling legislation was passed, skunk coats were not popular. The price of pelts and subsequent harvest of skunks dropped drastically during the early 1940s.

Since the 1960s the average annual harvest of skunk pelts has increased somewhat to more than 130,000 in the 1970s and 270,000 in the 1980s. As with the pre-20th century harvest, the United States dominated the total North American harvest in the 20th century, with Canada contributing at most 11% of the harvest from the 1930s onwards. In general, Canadian harvests of skunks declined from an average of 137,000 pelts per year in the 1930s to 600 per year in the 1960s, before increasing slightly to about 1,200 per year in the 1980s.



Harvests of all skunks in the United States declined from an average of 1.2 million per year in the 1930s to only 38,000 per year in the 1960s. The average annual harvest has increased since the 1960s and was more than 271,000 in the 1980s.

History Matters
It is simple - Add something you have to take something away.
Just 1 example of 1 nest predator

​1930s & 1940s - The Raccoon U.S. harvest averaged about 360,000 per year in the 1930s, increased to about 900,000 per year in the 1940s,.

1946 to 1953 - Missouri Landowner Predator Control Program - (See Complete Program Page from 1953)

​1953 - Restoration of the Wild Turkey Started in Missouri

1960s -  The Raccoon U.S. harvest averaged increased further to 1.3 million pelts per year in the 1960s

​1979 - Restoration of the Wild Turkey Ended in Missouri

​1980s - The total North American yearly average harvest of more than 4.4 million pelts in the 1980s makes the raccoon harvest the most valuable of all North American furbearers.

2023 - The Raccoon U.S. harvest will hit a historical low of 100,000 or less pelts per year in the 2023 
​

History of the Coyote

Picture

COYOTE - “UNITED STATES TOP PREDATOR” – Just by sheer numbers.


If someone sees a Black Bear, Cougar or Wolf in their yard, the police are called, and it makes the local TV Station or newspaper. There are estimated 380,000 combined wolves, cougars and black bears in the United States and their range is limited by today society. Together they aren’t even close to the population of the modern day’s most dangerous predator in the United States. Coyotes are now known to inhabit all 48 states in the contiguous United States, which could not be said just 20 years ago.


Around 400,000 coyotes are taken in the United States yearly, yet it is believed that the population has more than double than it was 150 years ago. The new range and population are so large that not one wildlife biologist can put a number on it.  Only a few states even give estimated of coyote population.
 
The unofficial estimate for coyote’s in Missouri are around 250,000.
 
Why do numbers matter?

“If you keep a deer population above a certain threshold level, the deer population will rebound back to high deer numbers,” said Stephen Ditchkoff lead researcher at Auburn University Deer Lab. “But if you push it below a threshold level, then coyotes are able to pull it down further.”
 
Could coyotes be the problem for fawn mortality? The number of fawns to adult doe in the harvest suggests that fawn survival had declined. Up to about 1990 the number of fawns to doe ratio was around 0 .81 to 1.27. By the late 1990s to the early 2000s the number of fawns to adult doe ratio ranged from 0.21 to 0 .55.
 
Quality Deer Management Association recently released some details from other deer-coyote studies. An Auburn University deer study showed that trapping and removing coyotes and other predators improved fawn survival in that area by about 80 percent. The University of Georgia deer researchers analyzed 353 coyote scat samples from two public hunting areas. During the fawning time, coyotes switched almost exclusively to fawns for food.
 
On a 2,000-acre tract of land in north Alabama, biologists at the University of Georgia’s Deer Lab compiled a different study. In the area 22 coyotes and 10 bobcats were removed before fawning season. Fawn survival increased by 250 percent.
 
Coyote Facts
Coyote is an intelligent animal, is one of the top predators because they work in packs and are very effective at adapting to new environments.
 
They may also urinate and defecate soon after feeding, and usually scratch the ground with their feet after defecation much like dogs. Coyotes are predominantly nocturnal predators.
 
Typical Weight of Coyote – Female 18 to 30 lbs – Males 25 to 35 lbs
 

• Coyotes have 42 teeth, including four long incisor teeth.


• Mating occurs in February and March with a gestation period of 63 days. Litters average 8 or 9 pups.


• The territory for a female may range 8 miles, and a male as large as 40 square miles.


• Coyotes can live up to 12 years
 
Maybe this is too simple and has too many variables but this is how I look at it.
 
Female Coyote Effects, with no hunting or trapping.
 
1 Female Coyote has the potential to live 6 years and have 36 pups and if only 18 of the pups live in those 6 years and only 3 of those are female coyotes. So, in 6 years 108 coyotes added from population

 
Future Threat

As a small side note, that has not affected Missouri yet. The wolf used to keep the coyote population in check, but with overwhelming numbers of coyote and the now growing wolf population and the over lapping in ranges. Wolf-Coyote Hybrid’s have started showing up in northern ranges of the U.S... Bigger, stronger than the typical Coyote and only the future will tell what this new road will take us.


Northeastern Coyotes
 
For decades it was suspected that the coyotes trotting through the forests, farms, and towns of the northeast were different than western coyotes. But it was not until the recent advent of large-scale DNA testing that this theory could be put to the test. Several studies have collected DNA from hundreds of coyotes in the region. One led by Stonybrook University found that of 462 animals tested, the average genetic breakdown consisted of 64% coyote, 13% gray wolf, 13% eastern wolf, and 10% domestic dog.

The Anti’s are using this to call them Ghost Wolves and use there favorite weapon  “Endanger Species Act” to protect coyotes.


Just one of the reasons the red wolf disappeared from landscape is because hybridization with coyotes and the sheer number of coyotes out breed the red wolf. It will happen again as they keep trying to reintroduce red wolves.


History of the Missouri Armadillo
​

History of the Missouri Wild Turkey
​

BACK TO
THE POWER OF THE EGG

BACK TO
CHERNOBYL RACCOON EGGS

Proudly powered by Weebly